All the growth projects of the West, more precisely, supported by worldwide Masonic organizations and directed by British intelligence, resulted in destruction and disintegration. It is such an disintegration that it has disintegrated up to its molecules…

If the British intelligence tells you will be sovereign and grown, know that you will be torn to pieces, you will fight each other and you will never prosper. 

While the British intelligence supports the main ideology that represents the great ambition of that society, it also supports ideologies based on its own main target against it. For example, while supporting Panislamism, they encouraged modernism in religion through individuals such as Mohammed Abduh, Jamal al-Din al-Afghani, and also pronounced that the Caliphate would be taken from the Turks and given to the Arabs. It does not let the same people into India because it would harm British authority in India. The interesting thing is that the idea of Panislamism did not come from the Ottoman intellectuals. This concept was first mentioned in an article published in The Times on January 19, 1882, its translation into English as Pan-Islam under the name of the notion of Islamic Union. The French translation of this expression was used by a person named M.G. Charmes in Des Deux Mondes at the end of 1881 and the French writer took this movement until 1870 in the aforementioned article[1]. (5) In other words, the project of unification of Muslims is western-centered. Name and mission that will appeal to Muslims. Today, they are uniting the so-called Muslims, establishing a so-called caliphate, and establishing a so-called Islamic state, as is the case with ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) and DAESH organizations. (!)

In the previous two articles, we explained at length how western thought struggles against the east. We stated that Anglo-Saxon thought and Latin thought were different, but both of their perspectives were decorated with arrogance and the logic of seeing themselves as superior. The US wing of the Anglo-Saxon school is a bit coarser, headlonger, while the English school is more subtle. Another distinctive feature of this school compared to the Latin school is: The Anglo-Saxon school thinks according to the Hegelian logic, and makes its action plan according to the dualist logic spiral. In other words, they create the “opposite”.

To give an example of the rudeness of the Anglo-Saxon, that is, the American school, the former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo made a statement recently, saying that the West Bank is the "rightful homeland of the Israeli people." Israel's former Minister of Justice and leader of the New Right Party, Ayelet Shaked, said that the Jewish people have a legal and moral right to live in their ancient homeland. What is the difference between these two statements? No way of thinking can compete with the American way of thinking in terms of rudeness, headstrongness and lack of understanding. (It could be called a complete thoughtlessness.)

In the Anglo-Saxon-British ecole of intelligence; intelligence means wisdom, reason and intellect. So, what does wisdom mean: human imagination, which is expressed as sensation, perception, memory, representation, thinking, imagination, problem solving ability, can be expressed as human thinking ability.